The Verge reported on December 23 that the version of New York's Responsible AI Safety and Education Act signed by Governor Kathy Hochul was a rewrite substantially more favorable to industry than the bill passed by both chambers in June. An AI Alliance ad campaign against the legislation ran from November 23, spent an estimated $17,000-$25,000 and may have reached more than two million people, per Meta's Ad Library; the coalition includes Meta, IBM, Intel, Oracle, Uber, AMD and Hugging Face, alongside New York University, Cornell, Dartmouth, Carnegie Mellon, Northeastern and Yale Engineering. As enacted, the law reaches frontier developers over a compute threshold with incident reporting to the attorney general, and exempts academic research.
It follows two earlier beats in the same arc: California's SB 53, signed in September 2025, and the White House executive order of December 11 aimed at preempting state AI rules, against which the RAISE Act was signed days later. Reporting and legal analyses note the enacted text is narrower than the June version; the Justice Department could still test it on interstate-commerce grounds.
WHY IT MATTERS
For anyone building in a regulated vertical, the practical signal is that state-level AI rules are now being written by amendment after passage, with the compliance surface narrowing toward very large developers — so the binding constraints on your product are still disclosure and data-handling norms rather than model-level safety duties. Universities being on the industry side of the letter is the part worth remembering when academic safety research is cited as a neutral benchmark.